Magazine - Be wary of using glue

SEARCH


See all:
Authors - Dates - Categories - Online Back Issues

POPULAR ARTICLES
NEWS ALERTS
Want to get news alerts delivered direct to your inbox? Edit your email preferences.
RECENT COMMENTS

By in Cricket on 8th Aug 2006 15:55

This article appeared in Pitchcare Magazine
Issue 8 - August / September 2006

Be wary of using glue

There has been a lot of talk recently on the message boards about using glue to stabilise wickets, so I thought I'd clarify my use of PVA glue at Old Trafford.

We started to use the glue last year at the ground when one of our guys, Gerard Carter suggested that it might work well. Gerard had used glue at his previous club in Wellington, New Zealand.

Although we thought it was quite laughable at first my philosophy is, you can but try, so we made up a mix and sprayed a strip or two in the practice nets. The results went extremely well. The glue provided a little film across the surface and binded the top pretty well.

Having seen the results, I spoke to the board initially but they were fairly negative.

After a while I suggested again to them that we should trial the gluing process, and this time we agreed to do the U19's test pitch and 2 one-day pitches, this also proved very successful.

My worry though about all the current talk, the speculation on the TV and in the press, Groundsmen everywhere will think it's the solution to all their problems. Well it's not.

Using glue doesn't sort out any problems other than slightly prolonging the life of a pitch, and this is only of benefit for one-day games. I wouldn't consider using glue for any game longer than a day, because the whole point of a three, four or five day game is that the conditions degenerate for both batsmen and bowlers.

Everyone must remember that at Old Trafford, we have very hard wickets, and the use of glue in our situation has helped to keep a one-day track from breaking up, allowing its re-use maybe two months later. At our level, with the use of covers and the amount of studded foot traffic on the square, the glue does give the pitches a longer life.

In the nets, where balls are constantly pitched in the same place, the glue again prolonged the use of the surface during practice. However the balls do not bounce better or travel at a faster pace.

The pitch though has to be right underneath; soft ground, which many club sides play on and low and slow wickets will not be improved. Resolve those problems first before even contemplating the use of glue. Most grounds will never reach the hardness that we are able to create at Old Trafford, the glue is used just to seal the top, and on a pitch that's like concrete, it can work fine, any pitch that has give in it, the glue will not really be of benefit.

I'm also worried that Groundsmen will go and put on too much glue and maybe the wrong type of glue. We trialed various glues and settled on the Unibond Super PVA, it costs more but gave us the consistency that we were looking for. We use it sparingly, spraying approximately 20 litres of glue mix (4 parts water: 1 part glue) through a knapsack sprayer to each pitch.

We put the glue on at least a day before the game, let it soak in and harden off, before a final roll on the day of the match.

So far we haven't seen any agronomic adverse affects using glue, it breaks down quickly after use and we've had no problem with over seeding and establishing grass after use.

If you are going to try glue then exercise caution, try it on your practice area, and try a few different solutions until you find what may work best in your situation.

Read more articles in Cricket, by Peter Marron or from August 2006.

Read more articles from Issue 8 - August / September 2006



There are 8 comments on this article

8 Aug 2006 by Grassman2011

Peter,
Thankyou very much for that information.
I only hope that every cricket groundsman that uses this message board reads this article twice.
Again thanks for the info, i only wish that there was more fothcoming from the boys at the very top.

Saltire.gif 8 Aug 2006 by mario

Thanks Peter.

Like most things new there is a danger that instead of it becoming part of the toolbox it becomes a fad and is misused.

As you say, caution is the watchword, and I can only agree with you!

I know no boundaries.

Avatar: Fruit Bat 8 Aug 2006 by Mal

A good clarification of the situation and hopefully something that groundsmen will take on board before contemplating it's use

Geography is everywhere

logo.jpg 9 Aug 2006 by Loammeister


Good article Pete, always interesting to know the facts.

As with everything new that gets trialled and comes under the media eye, there is a tendency to get a sensationalist response from the media bods which misleads the general groundscare family to see something new as the latest 'miracle cure'.

As Pete says he would only consider using PVA for a one day game, as
'the whole point of a three, four or five day game is that the conditions degenerate for both batsmen and bowlers.'

Long live the great traditions Pete!

And really good follow up comments about actual practice at club level from bath and mario, thanks guys.

The light at the end of the tunnel is not a train

9 Aug 2006 by penguin

A good reasoned comment and warning! It will be printed and circulated to my commitee who have heard of, and maybe read, the article in the recent Groundsman, and start all conversations with: 'what about glue.....'!
Thanks Peter!

14 Aug 2006 by wicketdevil

I have been worried about the new star glue and that everyone are so keen on, the pitch still has to be well prepared and some ive seen on telly look anything but with lots more grass than normal and poor bounce.
We should have a proper trial under english conditions before making such great claims.

Can you just is the longest sentence in the world !!!!!!!

14 Aug 2006 by Gar-du-nor

Thanks Pete, a very interesting article.

I have not used PVA so far. I am concerned about the possible longer-term affects of applications of PVA, particularly if it were to be used regularly. Pete mentions no adverse agronomic affects so far (good news!). Has anybody any different experience or comments from longer term use?

16 Aug 2006 by donone

Interesting article. I suspect that the current 'glue fad' will only last for so long. However, I also suspect that for smaller clubs where there is great demand on 'strips' being used a number of times in a season groundsmen will start to experiment, which in turn could lead to problems.

What Pete Marron does not tell you is that he uses GOSTD 125 grade top dressing, hence (one of the reasons) why Old Trafford is like concrete. As a club groundsman I too use this and, as opposed to other loams, the two features I notice are that at times, particularly in dryer conditions it is prone to becoming quite flaky on top and it is difficult to get new grass seed to grow, due to the higher clay content. Neither observation is a criticism of the product, 125 has served us very well over a number of years and has assisted in producing fast decent quality wickets.

Sorry to rabbit.... but the point I'm trying to make is that by gluing wickets, for the purpose of holding them together, could create additional work for stretched part time club groundsmen - the rationale being that a glued surface will in effect take a greater battering and therefore require a greater level of remedial and renovation work (post) season. The net effect being a more costly and intensive exercise in the long run. Time will tell if I'm right or not, I guess what I'm arguing for is caution.

Want to post a comment in response to this article?

Login now, or register if you are not a Pitchcare member.

©2011 Pitchcare : 01952 897910 | Served by: Prospero | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Terms & Conditions Of Use | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of Sale
Home - Magazine - Shop - Training - Jobs - Used Machinery - Buyer's Guide - Message Boards - UK Weather - International - GreenFields Artificial Turf - Sport Construction