Magazine - Concert compaction

SEARCH


See all:
Authors - Dates - Categories - Online Back Issues

POPULAR ARTICLES
NEWS ALERTS
Want to get news alerts delivered direct to your inbox? Edit your email preferences.
RECENT COMMENTS

By in Football on 1st Sep 2007 9:00

This article appeared in Pitchcare Magazine
Issue 14 - August / September 2007

Just what impact does a herd of George Michael fans, heavy plant equipment and Rola-Trac covers have on the compaction levels across a football pitch?

Lee Jackson, Deputy Head Groundsman at the City of Manchester Stadium, has been finding out

Following the George Michael concert at the City of Manchester Stadium on June 15th, I thought it would be useful to measure the compaction levels that occur at different stages of the concert season. Using a Clegg Impact Tester I borrowed from a former tutor of mine, Dr Andy Owen of Myerscough College, the first opportunity I had to measure was following the remedial work after the George Michael concert. The pitch was split into sections - six points across the pitch by nine the length of it, giving us 54 points across the pitch in total.

For guidance, Clegg Hammer readings are put into the following categories according to guidelines from the Sports Turf Research Institute:
Preferred:55-140
Acceptable:35-200

The higher the reading the greater the level of compaction

The first readings (see below) were taken on the 21st June 2007 starting from the main service tunnel in the north west corner. As you can see by the readings this is a very compacted area, reading 301 on the Clegg Hammer. The reading below it, of 206, is also in front of the tunnel and is significantly different to the low impact south end of the pitch that had no plant machinery and little foot traffic during the concert period. From the grass health point of view these areas on the south side are also the last to be covered and first to be uncovered.

The two readings were also not within the 'acceptable' level set by the guidelines.

Most of the other readings were working towards 200, with two more actually going over 200. The other two that were over 200 were in high impact areas where stillage is stored during the stage build and therefore sees a lot of fork lift activity.

As can be seen from the pictures, a lot of heavy equipment is put onto the surface via the service tunnel, hence the high readings in this area.
The readings averaged out to a Clegg impact value of 177, within the accepted range, but not that far from the top end of the scale nonetheless.

The second set of readings (see below) were taken on 22nd June, prior to the set up for the Rod Stewart concert scheduled for 28th June. As you can see there is a noticeable difference in readings, in the main due to the fact that we solid tined the pitch on the same day using 16mm tines at a pattern of 90mm depth x 100mm x 100mm spacings. The most notable difference being the north west corner where the reading went from the highest on the pitch to by far the lowest.

The readings averaged out to 134, much improved on the previous reading and now falling at the top end of the 'preferred' range to just short of the 140 maximum. They also give a good indication that even aerating to a depth of just under 100mm after all the heavyweight use from a concert can improve compaction levels considerably.

We took the third set of readings (see below) on 30th June, two days after the concert and straight after the pitch had been cleared completely of the flooring on the grass surface.

The readings weren't too bad, though the main access area in the corner did compact heavily once more. Possible reasons for the results being better than after George Michael could be:

The average reading this time was 149 - just outside the 'preferred' range, though not much worse than prior to the concert set up taking place. Strangely though, in some areas the compaction was less than before the concert!

The last set of readings were taken after the pitch was vertidrained to a depth of 125mm at 100mm spacings.

The results, post vertidraining, were a bit strange, some areas had improved considerably in the stage area at the north end, but some in the south end, which had seen little in the way of weight at all during the two concerts, had actually got worse.

The fact that selected readings were not as good as the solid tining carried out with the Multicore previously indicates a link between the greater amount of holes made in the surface than the vertidrain, particularly when you look at the north west corner. The average reading for the pitch overall though is 129, which is actually the best of the four different readings taken over the last few weeks - work that one out!

Despite the excessive weight put on the pitch during periods of prolonged heavy rain, it is pleasing from our point of view that all the readings during this time remained in the 'acceptable' bracket of the guidelines set out by the STRI. As with all surfaces up and down the country, aeration will be carried out on a regular basis throughout the coming season to promote good drainage and better root growth. All we needed to worry about before our first game, was what type of surface they were going to be playing on!

Click on results images to enlarge data

First set of results

Second set of results

Third set of results

Read more articles in Football, by Lee Jackson or from September 2007.

Read more articles from Issue 14 - August / September 2007



There are 7 comments on this article

3 Sep 2007 by finchy

Lee,

Are there any major concerts coming up in the UK ?

005.JPG 3 Sep 2007 by Leeboy

We have two provsional dates for next year at the stadum but nothing confirmed. As with anything provisional, it could go either way.

3 Sep 2007 by robbo

Lee,

I have a theory about vertidraining and compaction, it goes like this, a surface is held stable by the turf grown on the surface and its roots which are at the greatest density at the surface and the density and therefore the stability / strength decrese with depth, plus in your case added stability with Desso fibres.

When you vertidrain all the lift is created from the bottom of the depth of the tine hole and has to fight against the resistance of the grass and its roots above probably causing a certain ammount of squashing above it. This is possibly what has given the unusual reading with the clegg. As expected deep compaction has been relieved but surface density has possibly increased.

We have just completed a mini renovation at St Mary's, ie; hollow core 150mm deep, break cores up(free topdressing), verticut, overseed and then vertidrain 250mm, hopefully the holes created by the hollow core will reduce the surface compaction even after the vertidrain has heaved up the deep compaction.

However we are in a situation without pitch reinforcements that allows us to carry out this sort of opperation and I realise that Desso wont allow hollow coring to operate effectively.

See you at Saltex,

Dave

005.JPG 3 Sep 2007 by Leeboy

Interesting, will bend your ear a little more on Wednesday!

3 Sep 2007 by finchy

Hi Lee,

Would it be possible for you to PM me.

My email address is: mfinch@scgt.nsw.gov.au

Just need to write hello and I will reply.

Would like to discuss the last concert we had here(Live Earth) and send some photos as well.

Regards

Michael Finch
Sydney Football Stadium Ground Curator

untitled 7 Sep 2007 by Barry Pace Last edited 7 Sep 2007

Hi Lee, may continue this convo in depth privy later but how long after aeration did you do the readings (am too lazy to look back lol).
Some thing very interesting has come from the trials done in New Zealand on the Deep Probes regarding compaction levels and the time delay between readings and how relief spreads from probe hole/outer air release over a few days after may explain some of the quirky reads along with the effects of sward cover, not in a negative way to the aeration process but in how it effects readings, while you know that compaction has been reduced but the figures just do not show it.
Barry

Plastic.... it's The End I tell you... THE END!!!!

005.JPG 8 Sep 2007 by Leeboy

Michael, got our email and will read it properly next week, last week was hectic with a game, playground show and other things cropping up.

Barry, the readings were all taken within 24 hours of aeration being carried out, sward cover was poor in the top half of the pitch, 20% maximum in places and has only come back over the last couple of weeks.

Want to post a comment in response to this article?

Login now, or register if you are not a Pitchcare member.

©2011 Pitchcare : 01952 897910 | Served by: Prospero | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Terms & Conditions Of Use | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of Sale
Home - Magazine - Shop - Training - Jobs - Used Machinery - Buyer's Guide - Message Boards - UK Weather - International - GreenFields Artificial Turf - Sport Construction