Magazine - DLF features strongly in amenity turfgrass tables

SEARCH


See all:
Authors - Dates - Categories - Online Back Issues

POPULAR ARTICLES
NEWS ALERTS
Want to get news alerts delivered direct to your inbox? Edit your email preferences.
RECENT COMMENTS

By in Industry on 22nd Jul 2011 15:00

seed 2011The world's largest grass grower and producer is tightening its grip on the amenity turfgrass market, new research reveals.

Turfgrass Seed 2011, the definitive buyer's guide to which quality cultivars perform best in independent trials conducted by the Sports Turf Research Institute, shows DLF Trifolium's varieties heading many of the league tables across the spectrum of grasses and sector applications

Each year, The British Society of Plant Breeders (BSPB) and STRI collaborate to produce the Turfgrass Seed, which reports comprehensive results of available varieties in trials designed to test suitability for use in winter and summer sports pitches, lawns, tennis courts turf and general landscaping, and use in the intensive management practised by golf clubs and bowling greens.

The guide presents the best available interpretation of correctly designed, accurately analysed and independently supervised trials for professional users of high quality amenity grass cultivars.

"Cultivars at the top of each list may not be the best cultivar for every use, says Derek Smith, Amenity Sales Manager for DLF Trifolium and chair of the BSPB's Amenity Grass Group.

"Users should identify which characteristics are most important for their intended use and then select cultivars accordingly."

For sport, smooth-stalked meadowgrass can prove as hardwearing as perennial ryegrass once established and usually has better tolerance of close mowing.

The new cultivar Gaudi tops the smooth-stalked meadowgrass league table (S2). Recovery is particularly impressive at 7.9 as is live ground cover and visual merit (7.5 and 7.7 respectively).

The grass's rhizomatous growth allows the cultivar to withstand the impact of boots, so the turf does not cut up so much. It's sown widely throughout continental Europe for match pitches. "Training grounds sown with smooth stalk still look great five years later, we are so convinced of the benefits we have introduced the new Johnsons J Rhizome Recovery mix,," reports Smith.

In fact, DLF enjoys a clean sweep of the first five placements with Sombrero, Greenteam, Julius and Harmonie, the next four behind Gaudi.

Elsewhere, Kaitos and Sombrero take the top two spots in the lawns, landscaping and summer sports league table (L2).

Musica tops the chewings fescue table in this category with Blenheim and Carioca coming third and fourth (L3). It also heads the greens and close mown trials table (G2).

Most notably perhaps, DLF's newly introduced hard and sheep's fescues cultivars lead the field - Manetto in the former and Quatro in the latter (table L6).
Among other new cultivars Cobra nova creeping bentgrass trialled best (table G1) while Manor browntop bent did the same for agrostis tenuis.

Perennial ryegrasses in the greens and close mown trials also reigned supreme, both existing (Sauvignon and Jessica) and new (Dickens 1 and Natasha) cultivars (Table G4), all suited to applications such as cricket pitches, golf tees and greens.

DLF is excited about its new perennial ryegrass Chardin. "It's good enough to head the lawns table (L1) new cultivars table but also comes a creditable sixth in the sports (S1) league. Chardin creates an exceptionally fine, dense sward, suited to both recreational and sporting application. As such it is a uniquely versatile new cultivar suitable for sowing in tees and fairways.

www.dlf.co.uk

Read more articles in Industry, by Greg Rhodes or from July 2011.



There are 3 comments on this article

27 Jul 2011 by imckendry@nzcricket.org.nz

The turf seed guide is mis leading - the tables make no reference to the LSD or CV - this term stands for the least significant difference and CV refers to Co efficient vairiation or simply explains the accuracy of the trial and the numbers derived.
It is used as standard reporting in trials to back up replicated sciencfic protocols and methodologies.
In most trials the final results especially in turf grass indicate there is a large representation of grass cultivars that are NOT significantly different. (cannot be seperated by means of statistics) By purley ranking the cultivars as the seed booklet does - mis represents the cultivars and is poor comparitive analysis...

STRI or BSPB should have full disclosoure available. I strongley reccomend following this to sort throught the marketing tripe by ranking that is often used by seed companies ....

28 Jul 2011 by Derek

You make some good points McKendry. showing the lsd figures has been discussed with regard to the turf tables. the purpose of the booklet is to trial all commercialy available seed cv's in a relevant manner for the intended eventual use. the trial protocols and booklet format is constantly reviewed for this purpose.

there is always going to be a compromise on how data is presented between giving every scrap of technical data and delivering it in a way which is clear and relevant to the majority of end users.

you are also correct in pointing out that the breeders that invest millions of pounds each year to develop and improve the grasses available to the market want to be able to highlight those improvements however small.

i think the booklet and the trials do a fantastic job of delivering the trial information in a user friendly way and i believe that it is the best trial for turf grasses in the world. the booklet also makes it very clear that cultivars at the top of each list may not be the best for every situation. at the end of the day they do give a clear guide as to what is available and in a true independent side by side trial provide the end user with good data to make an informed choice.

if you have any specific things you would like to see changed in the trial or data presentation please forward your comments and ideas to enquiries@bspb.co.uk and they will be taken on board.

thanks for the well informed comments!

28 Jul 2011 by imckendry@nzcricket.org.nz

Derek - agree the book is a great for the industry - I believe if it had the LSD disclousure it would be complete.

Only other issue I have is the trial site location - still Bingley? the far north of England where the trials are conducted. This is not representative of the wider UK climate. I do understand it is probabaly not practicle and would cost a penny or two to have multiple sites - however to be the best in the world it would be great for another couple of trial locations in the UK and even link with Europe system.... I would look to broaden the trial designs to include more turf management interaction rather than just the normal vairables assesed. I also think instead of the seed companies having to fully fund the trials the industry (golf, stadiums, cricket clubs sport UK, whoever are the end users) should also step up to the plate and help fund the reserach.. after all the sports and landscape sectors are the end benefactors..
Seed companies invest millions in R&D and are generally not well recognised for the substancial investments they make....

My two bob worth - anyway keep up good work - Rome not built in a day!!!

from downunder

Want to post a comment in response to this article?

Login now, or register if you are not a Pitchcare member.

©2012 Pitchcare : 01952 897910 | Served by: Prospero | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Terms & Conditions Of Use | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of Sale
Home - Magazine - Shop - Training - Jobs - Used Machinery - Buyer's Guide - Message Boards - UK Weather - International - GreenFields Artificial Turf - Sport Construction