Magazine - Important News for UK Users of Amenity Grasses – Have Your Say!

SEARCH


See all:
Authors - Dates - Categories - Online Back Issues

POPULAR ARTICLES
NEWS ALERTS
Want to get news alerts delivered direct to your inbox? Edit your email preferences.
RECENT COMMENTS

Going Dutch on Weed Control!
3 hours ago by: andy dixon

"What is the point when 97% of herbicides are used by private ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
19 hours ago by: petermarkcraig

"Thank you for those very kind words Mike. I genuinely felt t ..."

Will it take hose pipe bans and Drought Orders to see legislative compliance?
2 days ago by: vid

"Hi Dave, this may be of help to well financed or municipal s ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
4 days ago by: Pitchcare Peter

"Who's a fantastic tool? 'Genius' might be slightly overst ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
4 days ago by: Cranfield

"A fantastic tool for promoting our wonderful industry and th ..."

By in Industry on 10th Aug 2007 9:00

Proposed New European Amenity Grass Trial System

A proposal is being developed by the European Seed Association to produce a common Turfgrass Catalogue and a 'Pan-European' seed list. Climatic zones rather than political boundaries would separate the list, and each individual country will then extract the appropriate data from the European database.

The current proposal appears to require all varieties to be sown in all climatic zones to qualify for listing, with the UK falling within the Oceanic zone. This would mean that trials data produced in the UK would be merged with data from Europe, effectively creating an average rating for performance which will not be as applicable to UK conditions as the current STRI list.

Grounds managers, greenkeepers and anyone else involved in natural turf management in the UK requires accurate data relevant to the UK. We believe that merging UK data with European data would not assist UK turf professionals in selecting the appropriate grasses for their situation and for this reason we are opposed to this new system.

We have no objection to the production of an EU list, but we would like to see the continued production of the UK Sports Turf Research Institute (STRI) Turfgrass Seed booklet, directed by the British Society of Plant Breeders (BSPB). This is a document which UK and European turf professionals are familiar with using.

The lack of historical information on some varieties would create significant problems if it were to be used alongside UK data in the Turfgrass booklet. We also believe that breeders would not be prepared, or able to afford, to re-enter all varieties into the new system to produce this data. One likely result would be that the number of quality UK varieties would reduce, and the market would be dominated by average performing 'pan-European' varieties.

A Technical Committee within the ESA would be responsibility for modifying protocols and implementing the new system. We are concerned about losing control over the protocol and whether the subsequent quality of the trials would slip and are seeking reassurance on this matter. There are many more observations made at the STRI than are proposed in this new European system, leading to more information for end users. In addition, European trials have different cutting heights than are traditionally used in the UK, meaning that some data will be irrelevant. A further advantage of the STRI trials is that they are independent, while the proposed new system will use some trial sites operated by individual companies.

Any potential changes to the system, protocols or species would have to be put to the Technical Committee for consideration. This Committee would consist principally of representatives from the breeding industry.

European legislation has a tendency to be ratified below the radar, only for the UK to find they have to comply with something they were not involved in during the decision-making process.

British Seed Houses is highlighting this issue as we feel strongly that end-users in our industry should have their say. Pitchcare will be conducting a poll to enable your opinions to be heard but BSH would like as many turf professionals as possible to voice their opinion.

Do you want a combined UK/European Amenity grass trials system?

Do you want to retain a UK Amenity grass trials system using UK-only data?

Please contact Simon Taylor at BSH by email at seeds@bshlincoln.co.uk with your views which the company will compile and pass to the ESA. We will then report back to the trade in due course.

Read more articles in Industry, by Ellie Parry or from August 2007.



There are 3 comments on this article

14 Aug 2007 by derekjsmith


unfortunatly the person who has written the above article appears to only have listended to half of the actual facts.

the idea is to simplify the european testing system by agreeing on a standard protocol. this will make it easier for breeders to produce quality cultivars better suited to our climate, and reduce costs ,which ultimatly have to be passed onto the end user. largely the proposals are to change the other countries to our system as our model has worked so well.

over the past 20 years many people have raised the question of one testing station for the whole of the uk. by having several testing sites that better represent our actual weather patterns turf managers will be able to access additional data that they can decide whether they think is relevant.

there are no proposals to remove the independence of the testing body!
there are no proposals to remove the turfgrass seed list!

if pitchcare does post a pole i think a further question should be asked:

Would you like to be able to access uk turf scores and have access to further data scores within our climatic zone?

my understanding of the situation is that we get everything that we have now plus the option to access additional climate data as and when we want to. there is nothing new in this as anyone who has ever looked at the american NTEP scores will know.

pitchcare_staff.png 14 Aug 2007 by STAFF - John Richards

Derek
Any views are always welcomed but, on behalf of Pitchcare, I would appreciate an explanation of your comment - 'If Pitchcare does post a pole (sic) I think a further question should be asked."

The above is a statement on behalf of British Seed Houses. Surely, they are well within their rights to commission a survey or poll on the issue, be it with Pitchcare or anyone else for that matter.

Regards
John Richards
Operations Director
Pitchcare

14 Aug 2007 by derekjsmith

i fully agree with you john . i think the site is great and everyone should be able to express opinions.

my point was that on this particular issue the information was wrong . this can be dangerous on a site as well read as yours. expressing an opinion is fine but posting incorrect information is a benefit to know one.

the additional question for the pole was in my response.

-Would you like to be able to access uk turf scores and have access to further data scores within our climatic zone which could be more relevant to your local area?

like all poles some times you can engineer the answer you get through the questions you ask.

regards
Derek Smith
Amenity Sales Manager
Dlf Trifolium

Want to post a comment in response to this article?

Login now, or register if you are not a Pitchcare member.

©2012 Pitchcare : 01952 897910 | Served by: Prospero | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Terms & Conditions Of Use | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of Sale
Home - Magazine - Shop - Training - Jobs - Used Machinery - Buyer's Guide - Message Boards - UK Weather - International - GreenFields Artificial Turf - Sport Construction