Magazine - Not seeing the benefit!

SEARCH


See all:
Authors - Dates - Categories - Online Back Issues

POPULAR ARTICLES
NEWS ALERTS
Want to get news alerts delivered direct to your inbox? Edit your email preferences.
RECENT COMMENTS

Remedial work at the SWALEC Stadium
4 Days ago by: Vic Demain

"Fair play to the bloke, shame about that flooding down there ..."

Remedial work at the SWALEC Stadium
4 Days ago by: madgeorge

"An amassing task Keith. You must be congratulated in taking ..."

Saracens handed pitch boost
1 Week ago by: TURFINATOR

"If you want someone to hang themselves all you need do is le ..."

Harrogate 2012
2 Weeks ago by: Leeboy

"I'm not doubting it was a decent show Richard, my point was ..."

Harrogate 2012
2 Weeks ago by: ricam

"Not sure I agree with you Lee, in around 20 years of exhibit ..."

By in Industry on 7th Sep 2010 7:00

This article appeared in Pitchcare Magazine
Issue 32 - August / September 2010

Okay, so we all now know that the country is skint, totally skint. Where all the money went I do not know, but failed computer projects and consultancy have munched through more billions than I care to add up, and a nine year war in Afghanistan has also helped empty the nation's coffers.

I read this with horror: "Today, there are some families receiving £94,000 a year (£1,800 per week) in benefits. The cost of that single award is equivalent to the total income tax and national insurance paid by sixteen working people on median incomes." (around £25,000 oer year).

Very few people in horticulture, groundcare or greenkeeping ever get the slightest sniff at a wage anywhere near £100,000 per year. After all, there are very, very few golf clubs that could afford a greenkeeper on £2,000 per week after tax.

The article continued: "The study also shows that more than 750,000 families receive benefits and tax credits worth in excess of £20,000 a year."
That is over £15,000,000,000 - yes, fifteen billion pounds a year, which is two and a half times the six billion pounds that is being cut as the first stage in reducing the national deficit. This is the tax take on 15 million people on £400 per week.

Hang on, at this rate we are running out of working people to pay this bill alone.

For one of my employees to take home just £400, after tax and National Insurance, would require an exceptionally long week. To maintain this level of earnings, long term, is illegal because he is classed as a mobile worker, subject to the transport working time directive, that limits working time to an average of forty-eight hours per week. Unlike other industries, 'transport' has no provision for opting out of these rules.

I pay a reasonable salary for the work I need done, yet I cannot find suitable extra employees, despite heavy unemployment amongst younger men. Why? Principally, because they claim that they would be only marginally better off working for me than if they were to remain on their existing benefits. One guy freely admitted he would need to earn £550 per week in take home pay (£700 gross) just to maintain the standard of living he currently enjoys courtesy of the benefits he receives.

Have we all gone stark staring bonkers to pay these sort of payments that encourage people not to work?

So, here come the cuts but, with the benefits bill running out of control, where is there room to cut?

We all know that local authorities have certain legal requirements, pensions for former employees, housing the homeless, looking after the aged, poor, child protection and social services etc. and these cannot, and should not, be cut - except where blatant inefficiencies can be rooted out.

However, this means that the cuts will be concentrated on discretionary spending, which will disappear as the first thing to lop off. I have been on site for several local authorities recently and, without exception, the grounds managers are looking at widespread redundancies amongst the ground staff, and they are also looking to cut higher up backroom staff.

I find it rather sad that many of the parks staff, who have worked so hard to return their charges to their former glory, will now lose their jobs as the parks are deprived of the funds needed to maintain them.

Unfortunately, the next few years look very black for all of us who work for local authorities in areas such as leisure facility provision and maintenance, that are almost entirely funded by discretionary spending

Once finished with cutting, the only alternative is to raise yet more tax - VAT up to 20% will further stoke fuel price inflation that is already running at 25% year on year.

It would seem that the business rate is also to be used to plug some of the gap in the local authority budgets. The latest rate revaluation - the third in three years at my workshop - now includes charges for the number of car parking spaces available at the workplace, and the extra fittings, fixtures and/or systems that I have paid to install in the unit.

I work out of a rented farm building surrounded by at least two acres of concrete hard standing. Should I declare this area as available parking space or just the three spaces immediately adjacent to my unit? Of course, the farmer pays zero for having all this available parking space, simply because agriculture has exemptions from almost all planning and rating legislation.

How British Industry PLC is to drag itself out of the recession when every investment that improves the workplace, in my case up rated electrical and compressed air supply, attracts extra business rates, I do not know. I do know that business rate payers have no votes, are seen as cash rich, are easy targets and can do nothing but furnish the relevant information - penalty £100 just for being late with the return - and pay whatever is demanded. I now pay more rates for my workshop than I do for my house, yet I have to dispose of my own business waste and I am actually present on site for less than 100 days per year.

It is not only the local authority that is on the make. I, like many hundreds of others, have a radio in my workshop. Last week I received a demand that I pay a performing arts licence fee, one month in advance, because I was playing music in my workshop that could be heard by my employees. It appears that my workshop is now classified as a public space, despite being over a kilometre from the nearest public road, in the heart of a privately owned farm and privately rented for the sole use of Terrain Aeration Services, my privately owned company! How this was determined when I was the only person in my unit and I own the only radio, I do not know. So, now I have removed the radio from my workshop and, instead, I simply leave my vehicle radio playing loudly with the window open!

Only in Great Britain!

Read more articles in Industry, by David Green or from September 2010.

Read more articles from Issue 32 - August / September 2010



There are 5 comments on this article

8 Sep 2010 by Linda Bowden

David don't show your jealousy of the farmer who you rent your building from. Farming has suffered low incomes for years, probably the only reason you have your unit is because the farmer was forced to diversify because he could not survive on the income farming alone generated.

If the public of this country were prepared to pay a realistic price for their food essentials, farmers would not be dependent on state handouts and diversification for a living. Milk is good for you, and can be purchased for less than the price of production, lager in the extreme quantities consumed by youth in towns isn't, but they would still rather pay £3 per pint for it! - I know there is a tax element in the price, but there is also a huge mark up from production costs, because it is a luxury - how mad is this world!

Farming is wrapped up in red tape just like many other industries, be grateful for the surroundings you are based in, you could be on a bleak industrial estate - why not listen to the birds and wildlife around you instead of drowning it with the radio - having said that, I support your view on the ridiculous rules with regarding to performing arts licence fees!!

8 Sep 2010 by has 2 mow

David

Another enjoyable post.

May i ask, why the 48 hour restriction, for working hours is for ? any further info available?

I work more than 60 hours a week, and travel around to maintain bowls greens, hence the question, as from next week we will be in the 80 hour plus season.

Mark

8 Sep 2010 by Grassman2011

European working directive i believe Mark. Unless you sign up to opt out, the maximum hours you can work in a week is 48. Unless you are self employed of course.

9 Sep 2010 by has 2 mow

Many thanks Gordon, self employed of course, like yourself a contractor, but i would class david as similar.

Hope the renovations go well, and the weather is kind to us, and all others during the end of season madness.

It's been a tough one. Mark

10 Sep 2010 by Lynda Green

First off I am in no way jealous of my farmer friends and landlords especially as he has like me just been busted by VOSA!
4x4 + heavy trailer for non-horticultural use = Tachograph!

Listen to the birds and bees with the workshop grinder, grain dryer, silo machinery, 500 horsepower tractors and 6 matbros roaring about. Get real this is East Anglian industrial farming with the whiff of 6000 sows and their walking bacon offspring to sweeten the air.

All this in the middle of nearly treeless barley prarie that got that way because of subsidies to rip out hedgerows which we are now paying to have replaced. Good scheme that!

Clearly my experience of a farm is rather different to the romantic countryside idyll.

I do drink milk by the gallon, I hate lager and lager louts. I too cannot understand how bottled water costs much more than the same volume of milk!

Linda I merely used the example to show how ridiculous and ever more desperate to fleece the business community this country's petty hitler's are becoming.

48 hours average over any 17 week period

This limit comes from the Transport working time directive for which there is positively and irrevocably NO opt out. Whether you drive under tacho regs or not, if you travel to different places to work even as crew, you are a mobile worker and the 48 hour average applies. However as you are the one keeping the records....Say no more!

Sorry Has 2 Mow: the definition of self employed has been altered and restricts the category to many fewer than previously. It is unfortunately quite normal for "self employed" to mean something different depending on the arm of government and particular legislation that covers the particular case. HMRC's definition being very different to the definition held as true by the department for transport

Hey time to stop or I will use up all next month's Grump material

Want to post a comment in response to this article?

Login now, or register if you are not a Pitchcare member.

©2011 Pitchcare : 01952 897910 | Served by: Alonso | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Terms & Conditions Of Use | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of Sale
Home - Magazine - Shop - Training - Jobs - Used Machinery - Buyer's Guide - Message Boards - UK Weather - International - GreenFields Artificial Turf - Sport Construction