Magazine - School Playing Fields -Maintenance for Wear

SEARCH


See all:
Authors - Dates - Categories - Online Back Issues

POPULAR ARTICLES
NEWS ALERTS
Want to get news alerts delivered direct to your inbox? Edit your email preferences.
RECENT COMMENTS

Going Dutch on Weed Control!
3 hours ago by: andy dixon

"What is the point when 97% of herbicides are used by private ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
19 hours ago by: petermarkcraig

"Thank you for those very kind words Mike. I genuinely felt t ..."

Will it take hose pipe bans and Drought Orders to see legislative compliance?
2 days ago by: vid

"Hi Dave, this may be of help to well financed or municipal s ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
4 days ago by: Pitchcare Peter

"Who's a fantastic tool? 'Genius' might be slightly overst ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
4 days ago by: Cranfield

"A fantastic tool for promoting our wonderful industry and th ..."

By in General Sports on 23rd Aug 2008 10:25

One of the key issues we often see during our visits to schools and local authorities is the limited resources available to maintain sports pitches. This article looks at the issues involved with pitches and seeks to give ideas of how maintenance could be modified to maximise playability and minimise wear.

Factors contributing to wear


Before we can give suggestions for improved maintenance we need to identify the issues surrounding pitch wear.

Apart from the agronomic composition, the key issues that will determine the level of wear a pitch can cope with before significant grass loss occurs are the soil type and drainage.

A sandy soil will generally be able to cope with a higher level of play than a clay soil. It is very difficult to predict this level but in the past Sport England have indicated up to 2 hours adult play per week on an undrained clay pitch, rising up to 6 for a fully drained or sandy pitch. Whatever the make-up of a pitch, try and avoid use if the top 30mm is saturated or very wet - this is when the real damage is done. Groundsmen often talk about their pitch problems developing after a specific game played in atrocious conditions after which it was an ongoing problem to present and sustain decent surfaces.

Maintenance is also a key factor influencing the ability of a pitch to cope with wear. If the maintenance of a heavy soil only consists of marking out and cutting, you can expect problems.

Graph 1 tries to demonstrate this. It shows that from establishment the level of wear a pitch will cope with is related to the level of maintenance provided. Maintenance could then remain constant or, as often occurs, decline as increased play occurs. The only way to hopefully reduce wear is to increase or change maintenance. There will, however, limits regarding finance, opportunity or just excess play that prevent further improvements.

Click on Graph to enlarge image


What's wrong with the pitch?


To answer this question we need to know the soil type, maintenance and factors associated with wear.

On heavier soils if a pitch is wet with poor drainage then the contributory reasons need to be identified. Most common is that any installed drainage is either malfunctioning or is not sufficient to cope with the demands placed on it.

On an undrained pitch the first option if the soils are very heavy is to intensively drain the pitch. In terms of maintenance, the first stage to improve the situation is to develop an aeration and decompaction programme. The "Verti-Drain" is an important way of increasing percolation rates. Such deep aeration treatment could be undertaken up to four times per year with other aeration also carried out frequently.

In conjunction with aeration it is hugely beneficial to give sand dressings. The spring renovation period is key time for incorporating sand into heavy soils but make sure that amelioration is achieved through the top 100-150mm and not allowed to form a thick sand layer on the surface. Sand selection is important and the use of a suitable medium-fine sand is important. The use of lower quality sands can often worsen the situation. Sand is expensive but if applied over a number of years can transform a pitch. Typically, 50-80 tons of sand would be applied to a pitch. At 80 tons this equates to a layer around 5-7mm thick! If cost is an issue then the central portion of a pitch could be dressed as this is normally the worst part. In-season local light dressings of sand to any wet patches can keep a pitch playable.

Another important aspect is the nature of pitch usage. From our experience the greatest damage to a pitch is often caused by training activity, I typically equate 1 hours training = 2 hours normal play in terms of wear. This is due to repeated exercise and the concentration of activity. The use of training grids to take training off the pitch and mobile goals to prevent penalty and goalkeeping practice off the penalty box are a couple of ideas easy to introduce. The pitch should be reserved for practice and formal matches.

The intensity of play is a factor; very few grass surfaces will cope with 10-15 hours+ play per week without massive loss of grass and surface disruption. But pitches can cope with surprising levels of wear and it is up to those responsible for maintenance to determine what is achievable. In some cases additional facilities will be necessary or alternatively restrictions on pitch use. Where younger children are the main users there is often less damage from play. Certainly records of play should be gathered so maintenance decisions can be made with this information.

What's next?

Once the basics of aeration and appropriate usage have been tackled then the end of season maintenance needs to be addressed. This should involve "Verti-Draining" and sand dressing. In addition, most pitches would benefit from overseeding and fertilisation. The seed typically would contain three or four cultivars of ryegrass, occasionally smooth-stalked meadow-grass and perhaps some fescue. The seed could be introduced in two directions at a rate dependent on live grass cover. Weeds may also need to be treated.

Bare goalmouths would benefit from cultivation, sand amelioration and seeding and then protected from play. The goal posts should be removed to prevent casual play.

In a dry spring and summer some irrigation would be ideal, especially on a sandier soil.

Fertiliser is vital in the promotion of a healthy sward capable of withstanding play. Heavier soils often require one to two applications of general-purpose conventional release fertilisers per year whereas sandier soils can require monthly dressings or the use of controlled release fertiliser. It is difficult to be specific without a soil analysis or knowledge of a site.

Good cutting regimes help to maximise grass density. The grass should be cut when needed rather than to a time-based specification. Allowing grass to grow long weakens the plant and if then closely cut leaves debris on the surface that smothers the sward below. You should never remove more than 30% of the length when mowing

The use of growth regulators is becoming more common. The modern formulations discourage vertical growth and encourage a more compact, dense sward, thus reducing mowing frequency but without affecting sward performance and ability to withstand wear

In summary - what would I do?

Initially, I would ensure usage of the surface was not causing unnecessary wear. I would limit training to grids and off pitch areas. I would try to ensure communication with the games staff including them in what conditions the pitch should not be played and perhaps get them involved in monitoring pitch usage.

Next, I would ensure the aeration, decompaction, sand dressings, renovation fertiliser elements matched the soil and surface.

Finally, I would look at the need for further drainage, from primary pipe systems to secondary systems. But that's another story…

Steve Gingell
STRI Southern Area Manager

www.stri.co.uk

Read more articles in General Sports, by Steve Gingell or from August 2008.



There are 2 comments on this article

Avatar: Akrotiri 28 Aug 2008 by Neil Dixon

Steve, you make some fair points but something you have omitted, that probably has the most overall bearing on the standar of the pitches is the neccessity for "normal" School" life to continue and the facilities they can offer to prospective pupils, and all regardless of the weather.

School Groundsman are under increasing pressure to ensure facilities are playable all year, wether this be during the summer or the middle of winter, for the required number of pupils.

I cant speak for other Schools, but where i am we have limitied space ( total of 45 acres for 1200 boys) each and every piece of available grass is used, if there is inclement weather we have to have 1200 boys inside the School.

We have a total of 11 winter pitches, but will often field 17 or 18 fixtures on a Saturday, so a good portion of the pitches are used twice on the same day.

You mention communication, and this is very true, but remember the Sports staff are under as much pressure as we are as they have pupils they need to keep occupied, so quite often letting them use a pitch that is perhaps not a fit as we would like is the only solution ( example, you are a parent and little Jonny comes home at 2pm because he cant use the sports pitches that afternoon, a) it does not look good for the School, b) especially when parents may be paying around £15000 for the privelage of a good education - this includes the sports facilities)

Resources, i am lucky, i am reasonably well resourced, but no where near well enough to be able to top dress 11 pitches with the required amount of sand/soil every year.

In theory there should be a usage / repair renovation combination, but in reality this is just not possible, often it is a case of making the best of what resources we do have, and being quite specific where we apply them.

28 Aug 2008 by Yorkshire

There does indeed appear to be a limit to resources used on maintaining school playing fields however there seems to be money spent on other things which are, perhaps, more 'attractive' but no more important - such as shade structures (I wonder how much use these have had over the past 2 years?).

Sadly there seems little understanding within schools of the need for on-going quality maintenance and care of the grass sward, over and above simply cutting the grass.

Vertidraining, fertilizer and weed control applications and the installation and upkeep of drainage systems have pretty much ceased and even when new schools (or major re-vamps) take place, there seems to be little spent on field drainage - indeed sometimes building contractors are allowed to use decent fields for access and storage during construction, with few precautions against the consequential effects on the soil structure, drains and subsequent playability.

Even with grass-cutting, there is sometimes no consideration given to the quality of cut - just to the cost. It can be hard for professional contractors and providers to supply a quality provision using expensive cylinder machines when competing against others offering to cut the grass with rotary decks - I wonder how many schools actually enquire about how the grass will be cut and what the effects may be in terms of quality of finish? It's a similar situation with white line markings against those who get away with simply burning the lines with pesticide - a method I consider both inadequate and also sometimes dangerous!

I find it amazing that some schools spend hundreds of thousands on all-weather pitches and mugas, sometimes believing these to be a 'total solution' to the problems of playability after rain etc, when a small proportion of that amount, spent on the grass pitches, would extend the season and usability considerably - and most likely have considerably lower on-going maintenance costs to boot.

I do feel that somehow we need to educate school managers and governors that just because there is nothing immediate and obvious to be seen (fertilizer, drains etc may be 'invisible' or 'underground' assets) these works to improve infiltration, drainage and sward composition are still very worthwhile.

I had hoped that the 2012 Olympics might focus minds on improving school playing fields but sadly, so far, I have seen little evidence that this will happen. Yes, money may be available to encourage children and adults to get involved in sports, but unless more is ring-fenced to be spent on the pitches themselves, the increased usage of already tired pitches will simply make matters worse.

Want to post a comment in response to this article?

Login now, or register if you are not a Pitchcare member.

©2012 Pitchcare : 01952 897910 | Served by: Prospero | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Terms & Conditions Of Use | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of Sale
Home - Magazine - Shop - Training - Jobs - Used Machinery - Buyer's Guide - Message Boards - UK Weather - International - GreenFields Artificial Turf - Sport Construction