Magazine - Use of chain flail/non standard accessories on brush cutters

SEARCH


See all:
Authors - Dates - Categories - Online Back Issues

POPULAR ARTICLES
NEWS ALERTS
Want to get news alerts delivered direct to your inbox? Edit your email preferences.
RECENT COMMENTS

Going Dutch on Weed Control!
3 hours ago by: andy dixon

"What is the point when 97% of herbicides are used by private ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
19 hours ago by: petermarkcraig

"Thank you for those very kind words Mike. I genuinely felt t ..."

Will it take hose pipe bans and Drought Orders to see legislative compliance?
2 days ago by: vid

"Hi Dave, this may be of help to well financed or municipal s ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
4 days ago by: Pitchcare Peter

"Who's a fantastic tool? 'Genius' might be slightly overst ..."

Build it and they will come... a report on the Isle of Man's first seminar for the industry
4 days ago by: Cranfield

"A fantastic tool for promoting our wonderful industry and th ..."

By in Industry on 26th Jun 2010 11:00

Use of chain flail/non standard accessories on brush cutters

Portable, hand-held, combustion engine driven brush cutters are commonly used for cutting weeds, brush and similar vegetation, and are frequently utilised in ground-clearance operations connected with construction work, using a variety of standard cutting attachments.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has become aware of a dangerous practice involving the fitting of non-standard accessories, not approved by the manufacturers, to brush cutting machines. In particular, HSE are aware of the UK supply of chain flail attachments comprising of a cutting head incorporating lengths of metal chain. This alert is relevant to any such metal brush cutter accessory manufactured or assembled from more than one component.

Background:

The safety alert arises from a fatal incident. Initial investigations indicate that a link from a chain flail attached to a brush cutter, struck a nearby worker in the head.

In contrast with dedicated chain flail machinery, brush cutters typically lack the robust guarding arrangements required to control the risk from articles (including fragments of chain) being ejected with high energy. The guarding supplied with brush-cutters is predominantly aimed at protecting the operator from inadvertent contact with the cutting accessory.

The fatal incident involved the use of a twin-chain attachment, similar designs have been encountered having 4 chains and one which utilises chainsaw type chains as the cutting implement. The presence of a CE mark should not be regarded as a reliable indication that such attachments are safe to use.

Issues:

The high output shaft speed of a brush cutter creates the potential for significant energy to be transferred to the cutter head. The chains affixed to non-standard cutter heads are subject to high stresses and impacts during normal use, and the risk from breakage and ejection of chain components at high speed is significant.

The use of non-standard cutting attachments not approved by the manufacturer may, because of their geometry and mass, induce excessive stresses which could result in premature failure and possible break-up of the brush cutter, thereby increasing the risk of injury from any ejected component.

Manufacturers' original cutting equipment such as nylon cords, metal cutting blades and saw blades are designed to be used in combination with specifically designed safeguarding systems. The chain flail attachments are not supplied with any compatible safeguard/deflector.

The harmonised standard for specifying the safety requirements for such machinery, EN ISO 11806, excludes from its scope brush cutters equipped with metallic blades having more than one part (such as chain links.)

Action required:

Any brush cutters fitted with chain flail or similar non-standard attachments should be taken out of service immediately and the attachments removed and replaced with the manufacturer's approved accessory.

Manufacturers' advice should be followed as to the appropriate combinations of cutting tools and guards. Such advice is typically available within the instruction books accompanying the machine.

Lamberhurst Engineering Limited Priory Farm
Pasonage Lane Lamberhurst Kent TN3 8DS

Read more articles in Industry, by Press Release or from June 2010.



There is 1 comment on this article

Avatar: New Zealand 26 Jun 2010 by Sumomosr

The presence of a CE mark should not be regarded as a reliable indication that such attachments are safe to use.

So just what exactly does the CE mark indicate in this instance?

GOGGA

Want to post a comment in response to this article?

Login now, or register if you are not a Pitchcare member.

©2012 Pitchcare : 01952 897910 | Served by: Prospero | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Terms & Conditions Of Use | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of Sale
Home - Magazine - Shop - Training - Jobs - Used Machinery - Buyer's Guide - Message Boards - UK Weather - International - GreenFields Artificial Turf - Sport Construction